The ThunderDragon has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in a few seconds. If not, please visit
http://thethunderdragon.co.uk
and update your bookmarks/blogroll.

Showing posts with label Tourism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tourism. Show all posts

03 September 2007

Health Tourism Costs More Than £62 Million!

How much?!

A confidential internal report on health tourism estimates that the bill for treating foreign patients amounts to at least £62 million a year, The Times has learnt.
The figure is “bound to be an underestimate” since new rules intended to prevent the abuse of the NHS by foreign patients are being ignored, according to the report.
A survey has found that NHS managers are failing to ensure patients are asked to prove their eligibility and are chasing only around half of the debts owed. The findings suggest that taxpayers are picking up hospital bills for foreign patients that come to more than £30 million a year. Some of the £62 million is paid back by the patients. (The Times)
A minimum of £62million on health tourism?! Why are we funding people who don't even live here to have healthcare? We may have a free-at-the-point-of-use healthcare system, but that is no excuse for allowing it to be abused. Free emergency care is fine, but £62 million goes way beyond that.

When the NHS is as skint as it is at the moment, despite the amount of money that has been pumped into it, we shouldn't be making it so easy for it to be basically ripped off. Ben Wallace, the Conservative MP who uncovered the report, said:
This Government is conniving at a ‘Don’t ask, don’t charge and don’t chase’ policy that is leaving the NHS wide open to abuse.
They are, and it is. And it is costing us millions that could - and should - be put to better use.

Source: The Times

22 August 2007

"Snappy" or stupid?
It may seem a strange way to entice tourists but Australians hope a blood-and-guts horror film about a giant crocodile stalking a group of terrified day trippers will boost visitor numbers.
The new film, Rogue, tells the story of a wildlife-spotting river cruise in the outback that goes horribly wrong.
When their boat is rammed from below and sinks into a swamp, the tourists find themselves marooned on a tiny island which turns out to be the lair of a huge, man-eating saltwater crocodile.
But rather than scare the living daylights out of prospective visitors, tourism chiefs believe the film will persuade them to visit the Northern Territory, where it was filmed. (The Telegraph)
Personally, a film is not going top make me any more [or really any less] likely to visit somewhere. It might emulate Wolf Creek and be able to be credited with a 10% rise in tourist numbers, or it might not. My prediction it that it is likely to have little or no effect on tourism - either pro or con. The number scared off by it is likely to be about equalised by the number attracted because of it.

18 August 2007

Tourist Sights Are "Disappointing"

Stonehenge is one tourist attraction that leaves Britons cold, a survey of "most disappointing sights" indicates.
But the ancient monument rates no worse than the Eiffel Tower, which tops the list for overseas tourist destinations.
The Virgin Travel Insurance poll found the Statue of Liberty to be almost as uninspiring as the Angel of the North...
Of the Eiffel Tower one respondent complained: "So long to get to the top and when you get there it's not even impressive."...
Stonehenge [was described] as "an isolated pile of rocks in a usually muddy field". (BBC)
Why are they all that surprised? What did they expect for crying out loud? Stonehenge is just a big pile of rocks - what makes it interesting is how long ago it was built. Just look at the size of those rocks and think how much work it must have been to get them there! Think about the exactness of it as a calendar in an age where life was ruled by nature, unlike today. When I visited Stonehenge a month or so ago [when the picture above was taken - yes, that's me (it's not the best picture)], I didn't expect much more than a pile of rocks, because that is precisely what it is. One thing they did need to do was provide an indent in the rope barrier for photo-taking, so that it makes it easier and prevents huge jams.

The problem is the way in which these sites are over-hyped in glossy brochures and the like means that they are inevitably going to be anti-climactic. Most of these are just old monuments. It is their history that makes them interesting. Also, since these are the mainstream, high-profile tourist attractions, they are inevitably going to be crowded. It's the very nature of mass tourism.

It isn't that the tourist sights are disappointing in themselves, it's that people expect more than there is ever going to be. Stonehenge is just an ancient pile of rocks in an interesting formation, the Eiffel Tower is just a metal tower in the middle of Paris, the Angel of the North is just a huge metal statue, and the Diana Memorial is just an open gutter. What more can you expect from these things?!

Source: BBC

Template Designed by Douglas Bowman - Updated to New Blogger by: Blogger Team
Modified for 3-Column Layout by Hoctro
Extensively edited for this blog by ThunderDragon
eXTReMe Tracker